Leadership Philosophy: Expand Your Mind

Leadership comes in many shapes and guises. As leadership comes in many shapes and forms, together with the philosophy of leadership. There were people from all walks of life who have their own philosophy on leadership. Who says that good and evil? But if you broaden your mind and allow your leadership to grow, you will benefit any organization.


Followers expect leaders to show them the standard and to train them to achieve this. They expect leaders to lead by example. Moreover, they expect the leaders to their information and responsibility. A leader will ask you to ask others to extraordinary sacrifices to achieve goals. Leaders may have to call for things that seem impossible to do. But, "If leaders have trained their people to standard, inspired their willingness, and consistently looking after their interests, they will be prepared to get anywhere, anytime, anywhere" (Reeves, 2004).


Leadership philosophy based on the opinions and experiences of individuals, which is why philosophy is not always together, even though you may have the same common goal. The best thing about leadership is that he always will thrive as you expand your mind. What would your leadership philosophy of today is not necessarily tomorrow's your leadership philosophy.


Much of my philosophy is influenced by the properties used by the U.S. Marine Corps standards and principles that will work well in every organization and some of them are: justice, judgments, reliability, initiative, decisiveness, integrity, enthusiasm, loyalty, and the courage to name but a few. Another important skill that must be implemented for all this work is applied knowledge.


Justice teaches you to be fair and consistent. No one can say that you show favoritism. Using the assessment to give you the opportunity to think about things good and rational. good evaluation has led to sound decisions, and sound decisions that lead to better quality.


Addiction "is a willing and voluntary support of the policies and orders of the chain of command" (Wright, 1984/2002). You must show that you can count on, and it was necessary because it shows you can be counted on to your boss and your employees. This means you can be trusted to complete your job. This also means that you will be trusted by your staff, who will build better relationships and improving communication between you and them.


Initiatives walking hand in hand with an addiction. Showing initiative is to do something before the instruction. This shows that you are reliable and able to think ahead and see the bigger picture than what is for you.


Someone who decide to show they have the ability to make good decisions without hesitation. Allows you to get the facts, analyze them and make the best decisions to come, while maintaining a high level or professionalism.


Showing enthusiasm showed a genuine interest and enthusiasm for your jobs. This will ensure that your employees more motivated and enthusiastic about their work, which will lead to improved productivity and working atmosphere.


After devoting himself to loyalty to your organization, senior, peer and subordinates. You have a sense of responsibility to each person involved in the organization. You are loyal enough to know if these things start to get unethical, you know how he separate from it, and still do the right thing.


Integrity is one of the main characteristics of my leadership philosophy. People, many things about you, but integrity is something that can only give away. This shows that you are honest and someone said to you. When the integrity is applied consistently, will build good morals and ethics in an organization.


Major features include leadership courage. Courage is the foundation on which all things begin. After the other features are useless if you do not have the courage to carry it out. Without the courage to succeed and the courage to stand up for what you believe, you do not have to be placed in leadership positions, because you do not have what it takes to be a leader. And if you do not have what it takes to lead ... that will follow?


Technical knowledge is the understanding of science or art and apply. Meet all your information and understanding for people, emotions and actions. Applying knowledge means that you find and share information with your employees to make them better, stronger mentally and more inquisitive.


To support my leadership philosophy, I have principles that I follow, known as the United States Marine Corps leadership principles. One of my principles is to get to know yourself and seek self-improvement. This is done by working to improve weaknesses and my strengths based on views and experiences to use. I must be technically and tactically competent. Before I can take the lead, I should be able to get the job done. If I can not do the job, I can not give you an example. Albert Einstein said it best, "Setting an example is not the primary way to influence others, it is the only way" Last., Do I know my staff to look for their welfare. As a leader I am responsible for the welfare of my employees' welfare. Their welfare should come before my own. In order for your employees is to show disrespect towards them and the organization, eventually leading to injury.


Many leaders philosophy of leadership is very different, but any attempt to lead, you must have a philosophy. You read many articles on leadership, leadership seminars to attend, or even leading a class that offers many different philosophies on leadership. I am not trying to change your philosophy on leadership .
I'm just trying to expand your mind.

Leadership Theories

If an individual was able to spirit some people to convince themselves in a certain way to a general or specific purposes, the individual should have demonstrated leadership qualities, and regarded as the leader.


Leadership Theory
Many authors state their views and formulate their own theories about leaders and leadership. Several theories fell briefly below for a snapshot of the literature on leadership issues.


Great Man Theory - This theory assumes that leaders are born, not made. The leaders are mostly members of the aristocracy, because they only had the opportunity to lead, so it believes that good farming contribute to the making of great leaders. The concept of a great woman androcentric bias has not been and never realized. Moreover, this theory also states that when a great need, then there was a great leader, just like Buddha, Jesus, Churchill and Eisenhower.


Feature Theory - This theory assumes that man is born with hereditary characteristics and the right combination of characters makes them leaders. Why leadership is a question of whether the properties are inherited or otherwise acquired. Stogdill (1974) indicated that certain characteristics such as adaptability, socially conscious, performance-oriented, assertive, dominant, energetic, cooperative, decisive, confident, persistent, responsible, and the ability to tolerate stress. McCall and Lombardo (1983) distinguishes four basic characteristics, namely emotional calm and stability, breadth of intellectual, highly developed interpersonal skills and ability to admit mistakes.


Participative Leadership Theory - This theory assumes that the conclusions of many better decisions than a single mind to make decisions. Therefore leaders to invite the participation of the person responsible for carrying out the work, because it makes them less competitive and more collaborative, thus increasing the level of involvement. Participants may subordinates, colleagues, superiors, or stakeholders. Level of participation may vary. The leader is able to aim or objective description and may the team Decide what can be achieved if the leader can make the joint decision to be taken in connection with the Purposes and methods or performance or the team May Propose but the final decision is always the leader. Many varieties exist, such as consultation, democratic leadership, management by objectives (MBO), the distribution of power, empowerment, and shared decision making. The negative side of this theory is that when a leader asks their opinion and find no match then it leads to cynicism, feelings of betrayal, reducing the decrease in the level of motivation and commitment.

Lewin's theory - Kurt Lewin along with others conducted experiments in the years 1939 and came with three participative leadership style, ie autocratic, democratic and laissez-faire. In the autocratic style, the leader takes decisions without consulting others. In the democratic style, the leader took the decision after consulting other people or let the majority decide what to do. In Laissez-faire style, the leader who let others decide that the decision will be taken. Lewin et al. found that the autocratic style has led to a revolution, laissez-faire style has no enthusiasm and coordination, while the democratic forces will prove most effective. Because the experiment was conducted in children, they still needed further study and research.


Likert theory - Rensis Likert (1967) theorized four pillars, namely exploitative authoritative, benevolent authoritative, consultative, and participatory. In exploitative authoritative style, the leader of its use as a threat, coercion and other methods based on fear to enforce compliance. It is always a top-down approach and attitudes, feelings, other people are not judged. In accordance with the authoritative style, the leader of a "benevolent dictator" and the award to motivate performance use. Leaders listen "seen red" than subordinates because they only tell you what to hear leaders in the hope of reward. Trivial delegation of decision made, but major decisions always center stage. In the style of consultation, dialogue leaders try but most of the upward flow of information is still red and the decision was almost taken centrally. In a participatory style in which the participation of leaders at all levels, including shop floor workers, and efforts to help employees more closely psychologically prepared. Disputes, arguments, all the feelings of betrayal occur in this style. Leaders' father figure 'and the' cult of the head, "which says in the end the final decision.


Charismatic leadership theory - This theory assumes that leaders gathering followers simply by their charm, grace, and personality. If a leader is not natural and charismatic leader that people need much effort to preserve the image and develop the necessary skills. They are usually very persuasive and use their body language is very effective. In a theatrical sense, charisma, but as exhibited by politicians, religious leaders and cult. Conger & Kanungo (1998) has identified five characteristics of charismatic leaders, namely a clear vision and his clear diction, sensitivity to the environment and the sensitivity to the needs of members, the possibility of personal risk taking their views to support , and the ability to conduct unconventional behavior. Musser (1987) noted that charismatic leaders want their followers to commit to an absolute devotion to himself. Charismatic leaders may not want anything or change something in contrast to a transformational leader to change. If a charismatic leader is well intentioned they may contribute significantly to the growth of the whole group, but if they are shameless and selfish, then by the formation of cults, they can actually raped the spirit and the body of their followers. their own self-confidence can lead them into psychotic narcissism and egocentrism they are so high that their irreplaceability, intentionally or not, can guarantee that there is no successor, so they make a permanent mark in history.


Transformational leadership theory - This theory assumes that a leader with vision and passion can achieve great things with inspiration, enthusiasm and energy injection, and thus the person or group against an individual or group achievement. Transformational leaders have a vision and sell their vision of themselves in the process of creating confidence. They lead by example and always in the middle of the action. To motivate their people, they used the ceremonies, rituals and symbolism of other cultures. They believe that success comes with a deep and sustained commitment and very people-oriented. However, transformational leaders try to change, and if companies do not have the need for change, they get frustrated.


The Quiet Leader Theory - This theory states that actions speak louder than words. Leaders lead with a quiet, his actions and give credit to others than taking all yourself. Quiet leaders do not always meet with success and is often confronted by people he's an extrovert who can not handle.


Transactional Leadership Theory - This theory states that people work for rewards and punishments. A clear command structure with loyalty as the main focus of the best work in the social system. subordinates to do what the leader says to do without trying to find justification for. Leaders create a clear structure and subordinates are obliged to follow. To successfully complete the work, they are rewarded while the settlement failed, they were punished. Leaders use management by exception, ie after the operation is defined performance expectations do not require much attention. Received rave reviews, while exceeding expectations do not meet the expectations get corrective action. The limitation of this approach is that it assumes that the individual is a "rational man" (who are very motivated by money and hence the predictable behavior), which is probably not due to emotional and social factors. In this situation, a different approach be more effective.


The Situational Leadership Theory - This theory assumes that a leader of the actions depends on a number of situational factors such as motivation and ability of followers, the relationship between leader and follower, stress, mood, etc. Yukl (1989) have six situational factors, namely the efforts of the subordinate, subordinate power and clarity of roles, work organization, cooperation and solidarity, resources and support, and external coordination.


Conclusion
Leaders are generally not a uniform approach, and they mix and match depending on the needs and requirements. In critical situations, they are more dictatorial nature, because they face the possibility of failure. Leaders in the public integrity show (harmony of words and actions with their values), dedication (of all expenditure of time and energy necessary to work to complete, rather than the time available to give), generosity (giving credit where it is needed to defeat accept friendly, and people can do their dignity preserved), humility (not lower or raise myself), openness (the ability to create new thoughts and ideas to understand) and creativity (the ability to think differently).

Leadership Exposed

Much has been written about leadership: rules, pointers, styles, and biographies of inspiring leaders in world history. But there are certain leadership ideas that we fail to recognize and realize in the program book. Here is a short list of things you thought you knew about leadership.

1. Leaders come in different flavors: There are many leaders and you will probably find more than one type in your life.

Formal leaders are those we choose to positions or offices such as senators, congressmen, and presidents of local clubs.

Informal leaders or those we look for based on their wisdom and experience as in the case of tribal leaders, or our grandparents, or based on the expertise and contributions in a specific field such as Albert Einstein in the field of theoretical physics and Leonardo da Vinci in art. Both the formal and informal leaders practice a combination of leadership styles.

- Lewin three basic leadership styles - authoritative, participative, delegative
- Likert's four leadership styles - exploitive authoritative, benevolent authoritative, consultative and participatory
- Goleman six emotional leadership styles - visionary, coaching, affiliative, democratic, organizers, and commanding.

2. Leadership is the process of becoming: Although some people seem to be born with innate leadership qualities, without the right environment and exposure, they can not develop their full potential. Similar to learn how a bike, you can also learn how to be a leader and hone your leadership skills.

Knowledge of leadership theories and skills may be obtained by signing up officially in leadership seminars, workshops and conferences. Daily interactions with people the opportunity to observe and practice leadership theories.

Together, formal and informal learning will help the leadership attitudes, gain leadership insights, and thus continue the cycle of learning. You do not have a leader in one day and just stopped. Lifelong learning is important for a good leader, every day brings a new experience that the knowledge, skills and attitudes to test sets.

3. Leadership starts with you: The best way to develop leadership qualities is to apply in your own life. I'm sure you, the phrase "actions speak louder than words heard."

Leaders are always the center of attention. Keep in mind that your credibility as a leader depends much on your actions: your interaction with family, friends and colleagues, the way your personal responsibility and organization, and even the way you talk with the newspaper vendor across the street.

You can not just "Talk Talk," you should "walk to walk." Repeated actions become habits. Habits in turn form a person's character. Steven Covey book entitled 7 Habits of Highly Effective People provides good insights into how you can achieve personal leadership.

4. Shared leadership: Leadership is not the responsibility of one person, but rather a shared responsibility among team members appeared. A leader of the group. Each member has the duty to perform.

Formal leadership positions are added responsibilities in addition to their responsibilities as members of the team. Effective leadership requires members to share their work. Started as a group only to individuals, members and leaders work towards the establishment of an effective team.

In this light, social interaction plays an important role in leadership. To learn how to work together requires a lot of trust between managers and team members appeared. Trust is built on actions and not just in words. When there is mutual respect, trust and confidence is built promoted.

5. Leadership styles depending on the situation: What works for Singapore, but not the dictatorship in the United States? In addition to the culture, beliefs, value systems and forms of government, the current situation of a country also affects the leadership styles used by its formal leaders.

There is no rule that only one style can be used. Most of the time, leaders use a combination of leadership styles depending on the situation. In emergency situations, such as periods of war and disaster, the decision is a matter of life and death. So can a leader of the nation does not have the luxury of consulting with all departments for important decisions.

This case is of course different in times of peace and order. different sectors and other branches of government is free to interact and participate in government. Another example is the result of organizations. With highly motivated and competent staff, high-style combination of participatory and moderate delegative the most appropriate leadership. But if people have low competence and low commitment, a combination of high education, support is high, and high organizational leadership behaviors of leaders is required.

Now you have to realize this in mind that there are always ideas that we thought we knew. There are concepts that we take for granted, but they are actually the most useful insights on leadership.

A Look at the Several Ways You Can Define Leadership

There are several ways to define leadership. Experts have tried to define leadership using several aspects. A process of influencing others to achieve business objectives and guidelines for making it more coherent and cohesive is called leadership. You can also leadership as the process of leading people in the right direction to achieve goals. Leaders apply leadership attributes such as values, knowledge and skills to carry out the process in an organization. Leadership to ensure that the organization works successfully and complete the desired goal. Leadership is also defined as a process that can have positive influence on others. This motivates people to excel in their field.

Leadership does not mean yelling at your followers to certain tasks. If you are the boss of a company that does not mean you will have leadership qualities. Leadership makes followers want to achieve high goals. This will be clearly defined leadership as a process that encourages its followers to achieve their goals. You can also use leadership as an action that addresses the followers lead a respectable and honorable life. Innate qualities of leadership, but can not be developed gradually through education and study. Leadership can also be defined as Lerner ship because it is a continuous learning process. Some scholars have defined leadership as the ability to inspire others to dream.

behavioral theory of leadership defines leadership in terms of relationships and behavior of leaders towards their followers. Some leaders are people oriented, while some tasks are addressed. There is a participative leadership and directive relationship. Leadership can also be defined as a process to promote and maintain a later generation of leaders. Leadership is about awakening the persistence and passion among his followers until the desired results. Some experts have defined leadership as the ability to dream into reality. Leadership means not only giving instructions to his followers but also striving hard to implement and the desired objectives. Leadership is a process of persuading people to do the right thing for a better future. Leadership is a process in which one person encourages, inspires and motivates others to work for the improvement of society.

Your actions should motivate people to do more and then became much more. This can also be defined as the ability of senior action for his subordinates to persuade an action. Direct people to positions of leadership qualities that make them good citizens prints. Leadership defines a clear vision for the company and the ability to translate into reality. Leadership as a two way street. You need your seniors and juniors to respect. Leadership to persuade people to go where they do not want to go, but they always have to go. Leadership is a process that will ensure that his followers the task is completed Leadership is also defined as a series of actions to work towards an environment friendly

How to Run a Leadership Activity

The buzz in the community of Learning and Development Leadership Development done. "If only we could train good leaders," went the argument, "we can beat the world"

This belief is so ingrained that nobody stops for this question. But if you step back a moment, there are some important questions. For example:

1. Leaders must be trained, educated Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin?
2. If a leader can easily be trained, why there are followers (which begs the question:)
3. What is so great a leader?
4. If everyone understands how to lead, not a problem when followers led a bad thing?

We all know that good leaders. We know when we were in the playground, and when they are pregnant delinquency, we followed. We can try our first cigarette at the urging leaders and clandestine pursuit of the interests of our youth in their bid also. It is clear that quality leadership is not only seen from a young age, but an important part of our development.

So why do we think we need to train leaders? Well, for several reasons. Firstly, although the lead an innate talent, like all natural gifts, if not properly channeled, bad habits and developing the potential of flowering can go unrealized. Second, there is a need there is more to leadership than candidates. Playground leaders can go to a military career or a more high-flying world of big business, but they will not ultimately running a small social units of the service road outside the provincial town.

Finally, leaders must become a part of the team and teams to operate effectively, the demand has led to the game, so they can effectively serve know. So after finding that a good leadership training is needed and wanted, how can this be arranged?

The jumping off point for training, and, formally taught the theory and principles of leadership. There are only three ways to do this.

1. Books. There are literally hundreds of texts on leadership. Most business schools also free podcasts and webinars. Students may want a number of treatises on various management systems and processes, but gently catch.

Some of the best writing is outdated and does not meet modern management ideas. Many useful pieces of academic, but based on case studies at the top of the experience of leadership and thus separated from the practical reality. Although the book is an important source, they were satisfactory as a reference and as part of a more focused study.

2. Program. There are probably not many programs as there are many books, but it seems like. Whatever your discipline, industry, academic or vocational background of geography, has natural leadership bespoked derivatives are packed with the needs and meet your needs. Although many of these programs will be tailored to your business with an experienced physician, in the end, leadership system, process or methodology will be taught as a matter of personal preference of the coach, because each reflects best practice. In fact there are hundreds of models of leadership.

Everything will be based on observations and research and will have an application, but there is no "right" or "wrong" system. All courses are not highlight a particular approach and provide a basis for consistency between the participants.

3. Practical experience. Sure way is to develop leadership practice. As led by the leader, the result is "successful" it must capture the behavior that led to success. And if this fails, the behavior must be changed and try again. Therefore, coaching and mentoring is very effective.

But of course, but practical experience may be highly desirable, can also be expensive and risky. So how can an organization that aims to inspire leadership qualities provide an opportunity to practice in a safe environment that allows their leaders seem to make mistakes and learn from them?

Although I am sick of hearing customers say that their business 'different', the truth is that the company is not equal to each other. Just as every person is an individual, any organization that reflects the people in it in terms of history, culture, systems, processes and resources. Perhaps there are common characteristics that a leader in the company can make, but there are no absolute answers.

Organizations must develop appropriate training regimes with their own objectives. Regardless of how this is achieved, it will almost always starting a process model or the philosophy of a culture that shows "how" leadership "will be done here. "

Although there is no doubt that the formal program a key role in defining a common understanding and approach to leadership, in the final analysis, a practical element to leadership skills is an internal process. Although not widely recognized or accepted, the leadership approach is based on the model of six stages:

1. History: How do we get where we are?
2. Location: What happens now?
3. Prediction: What would happen if we do not change?
4. Vision: Where do we go?
5. Strategy: How we use our resources to achieve our goals?
6. Implementation: The schedule, activities and responsibilities

This model shows that to be successful, leaders must ask six basic questions:

A. Where are we?
B. Where do we come?
C. Where are we heading if we continue like this?
D. Where are we now?
E. At this time we are there?
F. How do we get there and what we need?

By following this approach, the leader of the team structure, distribution of resources and support, guidance and information the team will get.

Although the model itself is simple enough, fits into the course a bit more problematic. The content is simple, direct and easily understood. With a group of senior, competent coach who can usually easily through the theory in the morning. The problem is with the practical sessions. Most courses are ten to fifteen delegates, but six or seven is not uncommon.

To practice effective leadership skills, the team must consist of at least four members. So with each delegation the opportunity to lead and assume that some teams can practice in parallel had this one all day, especially if it provides feedback and consolidation of quality. For practical experience, I use tools like the Super Tanker, Westrek, Vikings Attack! and Terra Nova. This is self-contained package that has everything needed for the session to carry out. To add "spice" to a competitive activity between the groups with prizes for the winning team to perform. This creates additional pressure on the leader and is a useful tool for creating tension within the team.

The following structure is very tight, but by limiting sessions to 45 minutes to 15 minutes for the feedback, you can 16 delegates during the day (very full). Ideally of course you will find the course spread over two days and allowing more time for the exercises and feedback. This will also give more time to consolidate and plan of action after the delegates return to the workplace.

Time (minutes) - Topics
10-Introduction and Home
35 The aim of the course, delegates experience
15 - Overview of leadership (Groups / Breakout Discussions on outstanding properties and quality of national, political, religious leaders, etc.)
15-Plenum Leadership
15 Introduction to Leadership Model
15-Coffee
105-Advanced Leadership Model (Breakout sessions and handouts on the Ask a Question, vision, strategy, goal setting, feedback)
60-Lunch (issued with a short leader to exercise to run in the afternoon)
30-Summary: What does leadership (acne & group sessions)
45-Super Tanker program (three or four groups in parallel)
15-Super Tanker feedback to the leader (follower to give feedback)
45-West pull exercises (three or four groups in parallel)
15-West Pull feedback to the leader (follower to give feedback)
45-Murphy exercises (three or four groups in parallel)
15-Murphy feedback to the leader (follower to give feedback)
45-Terra Nova to exercise (three or four groups in parallel)
15-Terra Nova feedback to the leader (follower to give feedback)
45-Action Planning and Evaluation

Alternative would be to structure the session to break into logical components and then run them in a series of 2-3 hour classes during the development of three or four weeks. For the hearing that the really successful it is important that the leadership lessons learned in accordance with the needs of the organization and that the delegates to leave the course with a clear action plan om their own performance.

The importance of feedback sessions can not be pressed. An agreement not to disclose must be obtained from all participants, and the follower should feed back to the leaders how they felt during the exercise. This can be a brutal, but very important lesson for the participants of the full value of the session to get.

In short, every company needs leaders at all levels within the organization. With some careful planning, clear learning outcomes and the right tools, almost anyone can set up a very successful program that provides dramatic performance and longevity.